I’ve been writing about my concerns over phthalates for a while now, here and here . I’ve written tips on avoiding them here and here . (When I’m on a roll…I’m on a roll).
Now that the issue is heating up with a huge and very informative article in USA Today , I’m finding myself better informed on both phthalates, a softener used in plastic toys, baby products among other things and Biphenol A, another additive found in the resin used to make plastic bottles, toys, etc. And I’m not the only one. Millions of parents are suddenly aware of the health issues surrounding these two chemicals.
Phthalates – Scientists are concerned that repeated exposure to phthalates can cause developmental delays
Biphenol a (BPA) – Scientists are concerned that repeated exposure to BPA (a synthetic estrogen) can cause the onset of early puberty.
That’s a problem for manufacturers of plastic products, who are suddenly scrambling to refute scientists claims.
In The European Union these chemicals have been banned for years. The State of California has taken the first steps to ban these items and the EPA is on the case but….
Whether these chemicals should be banned or curtailed pits scientists against chemical companies, consumers against manufacturers, the EU against the United States and the state of California against toy makers around the globe.And there’s the rub. If you’ve been following the Congressional brouhaha over the recent toy recalls, you know that a proposal has been drafted to increase the budget at the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, those folks responsible for testing products in the US to ensure their safety. A bill in Congress supports raising their budget, halved since the 80s, back to a reasonable level to provide at least SOME protection to the US Consumer.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has asked the National Academies of Science to produce a report on phthalates, a process that could take several years. The National Academies data would help the EPA set a "reference dose" for those
chemicals — the maximum amount scientists believe a person could be exposed to
in food and water every day without harm. The agency will begin an updated
assessment shortly on bisphenol A, which could take years.
Once the EPA sets reference doses, it's up to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission to determine whether their use needs to be regulated in consumer
products.
Since it has been revealed that the CPSC has ONE…yup, ONE tester for all toys sold in this country…that seems like a reasonable idea…no? (Did I mention that they have ONE full time toy tester - ONE, as in, a single person testing the millions of toys sold each year?) But, the head of the CPSC, Nancy Nord, has declined the offer. She likes her budget the way it is apparently. You can read more about the political battles here and here.
In the meantime, we’re on our own folks! As concerned parents there are steps but draconian ones that we can take….pretty scary, seemingly almost impossible but, with a nation of suddenly very eco conscious kids, doable.
I’m trying to avoid plastics these days and which could be a chore.
I’ve done away with plastic plates and bowls. For breakable situations I’ve switched to unpainted wood or metal – kind of retro don’t you think?
Rather than buy plastic water bottles I’ve taken to carrying a carrying a safe metal water bottle and filling it from a drinking fountain. (It’s just tap water in a lot of the bottled water products we buy anyway)!
Plastic toys made in China or the U.S. are out. Toy trinkets which appear with alarming regularity, acquired at parties and too many out of home activities are zipped away.
Waxed paper bags, reusable grocery bags and paper and glass are slowly replacing more common plastic storage and heating containers.
Surprisingly I have an ally in this fight. My DS, like many, many kids these days is eco conscious. He brings things to me and expresses his concern. Eco education is a part of his world. Rather than being concerned that he will be distraught when I banish a favored toy, I find he is unexpectedly leading the pack
From the mouths of babes …..
Bookmark this post:











5 comments:
It amazes me how far being the US follows Europe when it comes to pollutants in foods and products and we are supposed to be the world leader!
Thanks for the heads up on California. I am paying much more attention to my political leaders here and I was already a very diligent follower of my politicians and their votes and policies and issues.
I am getting ready to draft a letter to grandparents and aunties about Christmas shopping this year and about the gifts they usually buy my youngest child (whom still plays with toys.) This issue is serious, and like you DS, mine is also becoming very eco conscious and willing to adapt and this season is a good time to pull the rest of the family into some of the debate.
Have you looked at Momsrising? an organization that is really on this issue...the Speaker of the House recently addressed them and encouraged them to continue in their efforts with the toys.
Wait, did you say "one" (!) toy tester? Just one for all the millions of toys? Wow. Just wow.
I really have no faith in the CPSC and really think it will be up to the parents to get changes made via their pocketbooks. If more and more parents stop buying plastic toys those companies are going to scramble to change their ingredients.
Just look at the popularity of the BornFree brand plastic bottles that are phthalate & bisphenol free...they are always sold out and have trouble keeping up with orders. Imagine if a toy company came out making plastic toys with a similar marketing campaign. They would fly off the shelves!
We avoid plastic in our house anyway, especially toys. Both because of the phthalate/bisphenol concerns and also because plastic toys have such a short fuctional life. They tend to break easily and will only last one generation and then sit in a landfill for over 1000 years. Are any of those $5 Wallmart plastic toys going to be tucked away and handed down to grandchildren? Nope, straight to the trash.
Great post. Unbelievable info. Glad your ds understands the situation.
Great post.
It's very sad when the things our kids eat, wear and play with can make them sick. I check www.leadtoyrecalls.com to make sure I am on top of all the latest lead recalls. I get an email alert from them automatically whenever there is a new recall.
[BTW - your "post a comment" link is sort of hard to read against the green background]
In my previous life I worked in public health. One of the most compelling presentions I witnessed on the topic of lead poisoning was that of a colleague illustrating how little it take for children to be adversely affected by lead exposure. The analogy went like this: Imagine that a child is the the planet earth and a little row boat was floating on one of its oceans. Lead exposure the size of a row boat on the earth could cause adverse effects.
The effects are horrible and often subtle. A recent article APA's "Even a Little Lead is Bad for Kids" describes how teachers consistently labeled kids with higher lead levels as having difficulty following directions, showing more hyperactivity, and "lower overall functioning than did the low-lead children" (July 2003).
At the lowest levels it has been found to reduce IQ, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders, behavioral problems, stunted growth, impaired hearing, and kidney damage (see NSC.org).
An award-winning news article out of the Orange County Register was a six part expose of the lead content found in imported candy and snack wrappers that are commonly consumed (McKim et. al, Toxic Treats", April 2004).
It is a HUGE problem. Forums like these and word-of-mouth must complement our civic action because time is of essence in this type of situation.
Thanks for the Momsrising tip! That's my next stop!
Post a Comment